<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>alphafemme &#187; kink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphafemme.net/tag/kink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphafemme.net</link>
	<description>Femme in all its forms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 23:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;strapon,&#8221; &#8220;strap on&#8221; or &#8220;strap-on&#8221;?: a grammatical elucidation</title>
		<link>http://alphafemme.net/2010/02/12/strapon-strap-on-or-strap-on-a-grammatical-elucidation/</link>
		<comments>http://alphafemme.net/2010/02/12/strapon-strap-on-or-strap-on-a-grammatical-elucidation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alphafemme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gallimaufry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphafemme.net/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You ask for it, you get it. All of you who are not grammophiles, kindly ignore.</p> <p>&#8220;Strap on&#8221; is a verb, as in, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to strap on this dildo.&#8221; In queer/kink lingo, the object (&#8220;this dildo&#8221;) is often left out because it&#8217;s implicit in context. (In other contexts, not so much: &#8220;I&#8217;m going to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/mrsexsmith/status/8985342215" target="_blank">You ask</a> for it, <a href="http://twitter.com/mrsexsmith/status/8990744400" target="_blank">you get it</a>. All of you who are <em>not</em> grammophiles, kindly ignore.</p>
<p>&#8220;Strap on&#8221; is a verb, as in, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to strap on this dildo.&#8221; In queer/kink lingo, the object (&#8220;this dildo&#8221;) is often left out because it&#8217;s implicit in context. (In other contexts, not so much: &#8220;I&#8217;m going to strap on my seatbelt.&#8221; Not that anyone actually says that.) But the phrase &#8220;strap on&#8221; has two components: strap (a verb), and on (a preposition). Together, they make a verbal phrase. A hyphen is not used because the verb will change form according to person and tense (&#8220;I strapp<em>ed</em> on yesterday,&#8221; &#8220;she loves strapp<em>ing</em> on&#8221; etc.). So as a <em>verbal phrase</em>, it&#8217;s &#8220;strap on,&#8221; two words, no hyphen.</p>
<p>As an <em>adjectival </em>phrase, it needs a hyphen. The rule is that when two or more consecutive words make sense <em>only when understood together</em> as modifying a noun that follows, those words (excluding the noun) need to be hyphenated. Think of, for example, the phrase &#8220;small business.&#8221; &#8220;I own a small business,&#8221; but &#8220;I belong to a small-business community.&#8221; The phrase &#8220;small-business&#8221; is an adjectival phrase that describes the word &#8220;community.&#8221; Another example, taking a verbal phrase, might be &#8220;follow up.&#8221; &#8220;I will follow up with you tomorrow,&#8221; but &#8220;we need to schedule a follow-up call.&#8221; The phrase &#8220;follow-up&#8221; describes what kind of call it will be.</p>
<p>I know what you&#8217;re thinking. You&#8217;re thinking, &#8220;but strap-on isn&#8217;t an adjective!!!!!!!&#8221; You&#8217;re right, sort of. It isn&#8217;t anymore. See above, where I said that the verbal phrase &#8220;strap on,&#8221; in a queer/kink context, has an <em>implied object</em>. Well, it&#8217;s sort of the same thing with the adjective version. &#8220;Strap-on&#8221; is a modifier to the same <em>implied noun</em> that was the <em>implied object </em>of the verbal phrase. So in the above example, it&#8217;s &#8220;dildo.&#8221; Make sense? (So, in line with these rules, &#8220;motherfucking&#8221; as an adjective really ought to be &#8220;mother-fucking,&#8221; and why it isn&#8217;t is something I&#8217;ll never understand. But I digress.)</p>
<p>Now, through lots of use, &#8220;strap-on&#8221; has acquired nominal function of its own (as has, for example &#8220;follow-up&#8221;: &#8220;let&#8217;s schedule a follow-up for next week&#8221;) and doesn&#8217;t even need a separate noun to modify. It speaks for itself. But <em>grammatically speaking</em>, it follows the rules of an adjectival phrase.</p>
<p>Okay, grammar lesson&#8217;s over. Questions? ;)</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://alphafemme.net/2009/09/15/dear-internet-if-im-a-cis-gendered-woman-why-does-it-turn-me-on-to-imagine-i-have-a-cock-sincerely-alphafemme/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Dear Internet, if I&#8217;m a cis-gendered woman, why does it turn me on to imagine I have a cock? Sincerely, Alphafemme</a></li><li><a href="http://alphafemme.net/2009/11/23/why-alphafemme/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">why Alphafemme?</a></li><li><a href="http://alphafemme.net/2010/06/15/gay-guys-and-gay-gals/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">gay guys and gay gals, and why aren&#8217;t we all friends?</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/contextual-related-posts/">Contextual Related Posts</a></li></ul></div><p>============<br />
This post, <a href="http://alphafemme.net/2010/02/12/strapon-strap-on-or-strap-on-a-grammatical-elucidation/" rel="bookmark">&#8220;strapon,&#8221; &#8220;strap on&#8221; or &#8220;strap-on&#8221;?: a grammatical elucidation</a>, originally appeared on <a href="http://alphafemme.net">alphafemme</a> on February 12, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphafemme.net/2010/02/12/strapon-strap-on-or-strap-on-a-grammatical-elucidation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

